|
|
 |
|
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
Year : 2023 | Volume
: 2
| Issue : 1 | Page : 24-32 |
|
Molecular docking studies of selected phytoconstituents from some indigenous medicinal plants against different targets of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Vijaya Sachin Vichare, Snehal H Sutar, Manasi Pratap Rokade, Shashikant N Dhole, Vishnu P Choudhari
Department of Quality Assurance, School of Pharmacy, MIT World Peace University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Date of Submission | 01-Dec-2022 |
Date of Decision | 20-Jan-2023 |
Date of Acceptance | 04-Feb-2023 |
Date of Web Publication | 13-Mar-2023 |
Correspondence Address: Vijaya Sachin Vichare PES Modern College of Pharmacy (for Ladies), Pune, Maharashtra India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
DOI: 10.4103/jpdtsm.jpdtsm_103_22
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is a transmissible disease and propagated through a new strain severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) since December 2019 emerged from Wuhan, China, and this infection has widespread globally that causes to declare public health emergency in the whole world by the WHO. In this article, an attempt was made to recognize natural phytoconstituents from various indigenous medicinal plants, in order to utilize as a source against COVID-19 infections by virtue of molecular docking. The main focus of the study was molecular docking analysis of forty phytoconstituents from plants such as Tinospora cordifolia, Zingiber officinale, Azadirachta indica, Withania somnifera, Glycyrrhiza glabra, and Ocimum tenuiflorum with four different targets of SARS-CoV-2. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to determine binding affinity of phytoconstitutents against different targets of SARS CoV2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Molecular docking was performed using VLifeMDS® (version: 4.6. 08032021) and AutoDockTools. RESULTS: Among forty phytoconstituents based on binding affinity, berberine and vicenin 2 showed the highest potential toward 3-chymotrypsin-like protease enzyme of SARS-CoV-2. Licorice and tinosporide had the potential to bind with the angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 of SARS-CoV-2. Rosmarinic acid also has a binding affinity toward papain-like protease (PLpro) enzyme of SARS-CoV-2. It has been also seen that isoorientin has ability to bind to RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSION: Based on docking scores, the phytoconstituents from T. cordifolia, Z. officinale, A. Indica, W. somnifera, G. glabra, and O. tenuiflorum showed a good potential for binding to selected targets of SARS-CoV-2, and the antiviral activity of these plants can be scientifically supported by docking studies.
Keywords: COVID-19, molecular docking, phytoconstituents, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
How to cite this article: Vichare VS, Sutar SH, Rokade MP, Dhole SN, Choudhari VP. Molecular docking studies of selected phytoconstituents from some indigenous medicinal plants against different targets of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. J Prev Diagn Treat Strategies Med 2023;2:24-32 |
How to cite this URL: Vichare VS, Sutar SH, Rokade MP, Dhole SN, Choudhari VP. Molecular docking studies of selected phytoconstituents from some indigenous medicinal plants against different targets of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. J Prev Diagn Treat Strategies Med [serial online] 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 31];2:24-32. Available from: http://www.jpdtsm.com/text.asp?2023/2/1/24/371631 |
Introduction | |  |
The new public health pandemic COVID-19 is threatening to the world with the outbreak of novel coronavirus resulting in more than 4.5 million deaths worldwide.[1] It has been declared as a public health emergency by the WHO.[2] In December 2019, a new virus has been emerged in Wuhan, China, which spread across different countries that lead to public health emergency. It is an infectious disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).[3],[4] Coronaviruses have positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses in their genome and have spike membrane of glycoprotein on their surfaces which resembles as a crown-like structure.[5] The virus contains S-protein, papain-like protease (PLpro), and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) which are involved in viral entry, replication, and immune response evasion. Drugs targeting these proteins have a great potential for inhibition.[6] The spike protein directly interacts with peptidase domain of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2) receptors which allows the entry of virus into the cell. This ACE-2 interaction with spike proteins could aid in producing vaccines or antivirals that can block the CoV infection by targeting ACE-2.[7] The reported most common symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection are shortness of breath, fever, and cough since the epidemic, but now, new symptoms either as a result of squeal or viral infections are observed.[8]
In the literatures, phytoconstituents from Tinospora cordifolia,[9],[10],[11],[12] Ocimum tenuiflorum,[13],[14] Withania somnifera,[15],[16] G. glabra,[17],[18],[19] Zingiber officinale,[20],[21] and Azadirachta indica[22],[23] have been reported for antiviral potential.
Molecular docking is a type of computational modeling that helps determine the optimal binding orientation of one molecule (for example, a ligand) to another (for example, a receptor) when they interact to form a stable complex.[24] Because of its capacity to determine the conformation of small-molecule ligands within the appropriate target binding site with a high degree of accuracy, molecular docking is one of the most commonly utilized methods in structure-based drug design.[25]
Targets 3-chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro), RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), human ACE-2, and PLpro were selected based on previous studies.[26],[27],[28],[29],[30]
In this study, to determine the binding affinity, we have tried to investigate the docking characteristics of forty selected phytoconstituents from traditional medicinal system against the four different targets of SARS-CoV-2.
Subjects and Methods | |  |
Computational tools for molecular docking from technology platform VLifeMDS® (version: 4.6. 08032021) have been utilized for the current work. The steps involved in the current work are:
The details of work carried out in each step are as below:
Selection of target structures
The Protein Data Bank (PDB) structures for the selected targets were obtained from rcsb.org. These structures were further cleaned in the following steps:
- Adding hydrogen
- Completing incomplete residues
- Adding missing residues
- Removed unwanted chains and ligands.
Cleaning of the ligands
The chemical structures were drawn in a suitable 2D drawer and converted to 3D using VLifeMDS. The chemical structure was minimized using the MMFF force field and MMFF charges, with a GRMS criterion of 0.001. The conformers of the molecule were generated using a systematic method. More than 13000 conformers were generated and the top 500 conformers were selected for docking.
Identification of binding sites
The binding site for docking was selected using the analyze cavity option in VLifeMDS.
Docking study
The docking studies were performed using BIOPREDICTA module of VLifeMDS® (version: 4.6. 08032021) A genetic algorithm docking was performed using the ligand flexible option and dock score as the fitness function.
The study consisted of four different targets whose PDB IDs are given in [Table 1] and structures of forty phytoconstituents along with source of plant are given in [Table 2].
Results | |  |
The docking score of forty selected phytoconstituents from selected indigenous medicinal plants against four different targets of SARS-CoV-2 is given in [Table 3]. The docking result against 3CLpro (PDB ID-1Z11) with phytoconstituents with the top five binding scores and interactions with ligand is given in [Table 4]. The docking result against RdRp (PDB ID-6M71) with the top five binding phytoconstituents is presented in [Table 5]. The docking result of human ACE-2 (PDB ID-1R42) with phytoconstituents having the top five binding scores and interactions with ligand is shown in [Table 6]. The docking results of PLpro (PDB ID-4RNA) with phytoconstituents with the top five binding scores and interactions with ligand are expressed in [Table 7]. | Table 3: Docking scores of forty selected phytoconstituents with targets
Click here to view |
 | Table 4: Docking result against 3-chymotrypsin-like protease (Protein Data Bank ID-1Z11)
Click here to view |
 | Table 5: Docking result against RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (Protein Data Bank ID-6M71)
Click here to view | } | Table 6: Docking result against human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (Protein Data Bank ID-1R42)
Click here to view |
 | Table 7: Docking results of papain-like protease (Protein Data Bank ID-4RNA)
Click here to view |
Discussion | |  |
Docking result against (PDB ID-1Z11) with phytoconstituents demonstrated that out of the docked forty compounds, berberine showed the highest potential to bind to 3CLpro enzyme. Berberine can potentially make an H-bonding interaction to bind GLN812: pi stacking (aromatic) interaction with PHE862A and hydrophobic interactions with ASN704A, LEU809A, GLN812A, ILE822A, ALA823A, and ILE826A. The binding scores of − 56.36 demonstrate strong bonding with the target. Vicenin 2 is one compound in the top five which showed an interaction with Asp808 which is one of the key substrate binding residues of 3CLpro. Based on the docking scores and binding interactions, the top five compounds have a good potential to bind to 3CLpro.
The docking results of RdRp (PDB ID-6M71) with the top five binding phytoconstituents demonstrated that out of the docked forty compounds, isoorientin showed maximum potential to bind to RdRp. Isoorientin can potentially make an H-bonding interaction with bind to LYS551A, ARG553A, ARG555A, and LYS621A, and hydrophobic interactions with LYS551A, ARG553A, and LYS621A. The binding scores of − 41.55 demonstrate strong bonding with the target. All the compounds show interactions with key binding site residues such as ARG555 or ARG553. Based on the docking scores and binding interactions, the top five compounds have a good potential to bind to RDRP receptor.
The docking results of human ACE-2 (PDB ID-1R42) demonstrated that out of the docked forty compounds, licorice showed potential to bind to ACE-2 enzyme. Licorice can potentially make an H-bonding interaction with bind to Gln442 and hydrophobic interactions with Thr445 and Ile446. The binding scores of −45.27 demonstrate strong bonding with the target. Tinosporaside is one compound in the top five which show an interaction with His345 which is one of the key binding residues between spike protein and ACE-2 receptor. Based on the docking scores and binding interactions, the top five compounds have a good potential to bind to ACE-2 receptor.
The docking results of PLpro (PDB ID-4RNA) demonstrate that out of the docked forty compounds, rosmarinic acid shows the potential to bind to PLpro from Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). Rosmarinic acid can potentially make a pi-stacking (aromatic) interaction with TRP190A and hydrophobic interactions with CYS321A. All the top five ligands show an interaction with residues close to the binding sites, thus suggesting the potential to inhibit the PLpro enzyme.
Conclusion | |  |
COVID-19 is a life-threatening disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 and has turned into a gobal pandemic, which lockdown the whole world due to its widespread nature. The main focus of the study was molecular docking analysis of forty phytoconstituents from plants such as T. cordifolia, Z. officinale, A. Indica, W. somnifera, G. glabra, and O. tenuiflorum with four different targets of SARS-CoV-2. For that purpose, receptors 3CLpro, RdRp, human ACE-2, and PLpro were selected. Upon docking analysis of forty phytoconstituents, berberine has the highest potential to bind to the 3CLpro enzyme along with vicenin and also has potential against the same enzyme. Liquorice and tinosporide have shown the highest binding affinity toward the ACE-2 receptors. Rosmarinic acid shows the highest binding affinity toward the enzyme involved in MERS, i.e., PLpro. Along with that, isoorientin forms H bonding to the amino acid present on the receptors of RdRp with the highest potential. Based on docking scores, these phytoconstituents from T. cordifolia, O. tenuiflorum, and G. glabra showed a good potential for binding to selected targets of SARS-CoV-2 and antiviral activity of these plants can be supported by the above docking studies.
Limitations of the study
The study gives the primary information about binding affinity of the phytoconstituents with the targets based on the algorithm.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Kundan B Ingle from VLife Sciences.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References | |  |
1. | Ahmed MU, Hanif M, Ali MJ, Haider MA, Kherani D, Memon GM, et al. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2): A review. Front Neurol 2020;11:518. |
2. | Lu H, Stratton CW, Tang YW. Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China: The mystery and the miracle. J Med Virol 2020;92:401-2. |
3. | Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet 2020;395:470-3. |
4. | Schoeman D, Fielding BC. Coronavirus envelope protein: Current knowledge. Virol J 2019;16:69. |
5. | Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 2020;395:565-74. |
6. | Yan R, Zhang Y, Li Y, Xia L, Guo Y, Zhou Q. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science 2020;367:1444-8. |
7. | Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 2020;181:271-80.e8. |
8. | Li H, Liu Z, Ge J. Scientific research progress of COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 in the first five months. J Cell Mol Med 2020;24:6558-70. |
9. | Mittal J, Sharma M, Batra A. Tinospora cordifolia: A multipurpose medicinal plant – A review. J Med Plants Stud 2014;2:32-47. |
10. | Choudhary N, Siddiqui M, Azmat S, Khatoon S. Tinospora cordifolia: Ethnobotany, phytopharmacology and phytochemistry aspects. IJPSR 2013;4:891-9. |
11. | Tiwari P, Nayak P, Prusty SK, Sahu PK. Phytochemistry and pharmacology of Tinospora cordifolia: A review. Sys Rev Pharm 2018;9:70-8. |
12. | Reddy H. A review on medicinal properties of Tinospora cordifolia introduction. Int J Sci Res Rev 2018;7:585-96. |
13. | Ghoke SS, Sood R, Kumar N, Pateriya AK, Bhatia S, Mishra A, et al. Evaluation of antiviral activity of Ocimum sanctum and Acacia Arabica leaves extracts against H9N2 virus using embryonated chicken egg model. BMC Complement Altern Med 2018;18:174. |
14. | Patil U. Studies on antiviral activity of tulsi ( Ocimum sanctum) crude extracts on selected viruses of veterinary importance. Int J Ayurveda Pharm Res 2018;6:17-20. |
15. | Jain J, Narayanan V, Chaturvedi S, Pai S, Sunil S. In vivo evaluation of Withania somnifera-based Indian traditional formulation (Amukkara Choornam), against chikungunya virus-induced morbidity and arthralgia. J Evid Based Integr Med 2018;23. doi: 10.1177/2156587218757661. |
16. | Kambizi L, Goosen BM, Taylor MB, Afolayan AJ. Anti-viral effects of aqueous extracts of Aloe ferox and Withania somnifera on herpes simplex virus type 1 in cell culture. S Afr J Sci 2007;103:9-10. |
17. | Fukuchi K, Okudaira N, Adachi K, Odai-Ide R, Watanabe S, Ohno H, et al. Antiviral and antitumor activity of licorice root extracts. In Vivo 2016;30:777-85. |
18. | Wang L, Yang R, Yuan B, Liu Y, Liu C. The antiviral and antimicrobial activities of licorice, a widely-used Chinese herb. Acta Pharm Sin B 2015;5:310-5. |
19. | Huan C, Xu Y, Zhang W, Guo T, Pan H, Gao S. Research progress on the antiviral activity of glycyrrhizin and its derivatives in liquorice. Front Pharmacol 2021;12:680674. |
20. | Kaushik S, Jangra G, Kundu V, Yadav JP, Kaushik S. Anti-viral activity of Zingiber officinale (Ginger) ingredients against the chikungunya virus. Virusdisease 2020;31:270-6. |
21. | Chang JS, Wang KC, Yeh CF, Shieh DE, Chiang LC. Fresh ginger ( Zingiber officinale) has anti-viral activity against human respiratory syncytial virus in human respiratory tract cell lines. J Ethnopharmacol 2013;145:146-51. |
22. | Ashfaq UA, Jalil A, Ul Qamar MT. Antiviral phytochemicals identification from Azadirachta indica leaves against HCV NS3 protease: An in silico approach. Nat Prod Res 2016;30:1866-9. |
23. | Ahmad A, Javed MR, Rao AQ, Husnain T. Designing and screening of universal drug from neem ( Azadirachta indica) and standard drug chemicals against influenza virus nucleoprotein. BMC Complement Altern Med 2016;16:519. |
24. | Agarwal S, Mehrlotra R. An overview of molecular docking. JSM Chem 2016;4:1024. |
25. | Prieto-Martínez FD, Arciniega M, Medina-Franco JL. Molecular docking: Current advances and challenges. TIP Rev Esp Cienc Quím Biol 2018;21:65-87. |
26. | Sagar V, Kumar A. Efficacy of natural compounds from Tinospora cordifolia against SARS-CoV-2 protease, surface glycoprotein and RNA polymerase. Biol Eng Med Sci Rep 2020;6:6-8. |
27. | Gandhi AJ, Rupareliya JD, Shukla VJ, Donga SB, Acharya R. An ayurvedic perspective along with in silico study of the drugs for the management of SARS-CoV-2. J Ayurveda Integr Med 2022;13:100343. |
28. | Patel A, Patel A, Hemani R, Solanki R, Kansara J, Patel G, et al. Exploring the in-silico approach for assessing the potential of natural compounds as SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors. Org Commun 2021;14:58-72. |
29. | Muralikumar V, Ramakrishnamacharya C. Inhibitory effect of phytochemicals from Azadirachta indica a juss. and Tinospora cordifolia (thunb.) Miers against SARS-COV-2 Mpro and spike protease an in-silico analysis. Sci Open Preprints. [DOI: 10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PPI1TYM.v1]. |
30. | Abd El-Aziz NM, Khalifa I, Darwish AM, Badr AN, Aljumayi H, Hafez ES, et al. Docking analysis of some bioactive compounds from traditional plants against SARS-CoV-2 target proteins. Molecules 2022;27:2662. |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7]
|